Cannon-Comparison Table after new Update

Discussion in 'Users’ Corner' started by Apokalyps, Aug 18, 2017.

Dear forum reader,

if you’d like to actively participate on the forum by joining discussions or starting your own threads or topics, please log into the game first. If you do not have a game account, you will need to register for one. We look forward to your next visit! CLICK HERE
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Apokalyps

    Apokalyps Forum Greenhorn

    Hello,

    ARKY my friend you posted a nice Table on the German Forum with all these Cannons. My question is can u please post the exact same Thread but consider 349 Cannon Slots instead of 309 and also the new Castels (+8% Cannon Damage). For example on the Doomhammer 4 (135 Pearl Ammo Bonus * 1,08%= 145,8) etc. Would be very nice !

    CU
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2017
  2. A-R-K-Y

    A-R-K-Y Forum Overlooker

    Unfortunately, what was used to create that was outdated in terms of the new updates, so I am in the process of remaking it from scratch so I can easily update it for any situation or addition BP add into the game. What that means is that currently I am unable to mass produce the numbers as you seen in that post for now, however I can post a picture I saved before I started to rewrite it;
    [​IMG]

    I can not remember the ammo selected (I believe it was Ice). The caption next to this image was:
    "60seconds using same setup as normal apart from level 8 castle data, and the Crit Dmg castle and the Elite Ammo bonus castle from the new ones"

    I can also say with certainty that the new Castle Update will benefit the Doomhammers more than any other Cannon.

    -Arky
     
  3. A-R-K-Y

    A-R-K-Y Forum Overlooker

    If you would like to do that mate then by all means go ahead, most of the information on the damage calculation can be found on the forum but if you need any more information you can always ask and im sure I or the mods will be able to answer it for you :)

    -Arky
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.